<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.codeplex.com/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SubSonic: All your database are belong to us</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/subsonic/Project/ProjectRss.aspx</link><description>Ruby On Rails is propelling a new wave of programming - one that drives &amp;#34;Convention Over Configuration&amp;#34;. This simple, elegant approach is attracting many developers who find the intricacies and com...</description><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true"</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16468</link><description>The issue is that the isloaded flag is not set after an insert and therefore subsequent database calls get no dirty columns.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Sorry about that... Looks like I reverted some changes prior to check-in... This should REALLY be fixed in Revision 442.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:30:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true" 20080514P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true" (Patch)</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16573</link><description>Problems similar to this&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;t&amp;#47;3100.aspx&amp;#63;PageIndex&amp;#61;2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is a unit test in the attached patch that replicates the problem &amp;#40;as long as the patch to SubSonicRepository isn&amp;#39;t applied&amp;#41;, basically SubSonicRepository.Update&amp;#47;Save doesn&amp;#39;t check item.IsDirty so generates and tries to execute invalid SQL resulting in an &amp;#34;incorrect syntax near the keyword &amp;#39;WHERE&amp;#39;&amp;#34; error.  This happens when&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a&amp;#41; The object hasn&amp;#39;t been changed&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;#41; The object doesn&amp;#39;t have any &amp;#34;magic&amp;#34; columns such as ModifiedOn etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Applied against r441&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the patch&amp;#33; Applied in Revision 442.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:29:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true" (Patch) 20080514P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: QuickTable Improperly Qualifies Column Names When Where Clauses are Used</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16181</link><description>Upgrading from 2.1 beta 1 to beta 3 caused where clauses on my quicktables to fail with the following error &amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The multi-part identifier &amp;#34;dbo.columnName&amp;#34; could not be bound.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would appear to be due to a change made for Issue 15984&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The attached patch solved the problem for me.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Fixed in Revision 432.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:20:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: QuickTable Improperly Qualifies Column Names When Where Clauses are Used 20080514P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: PATCH: SubSonicRepository.Update on non-modified object</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16573</link><description>Problems similar to this&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;t&amp;#47;3100.aspx&amp;#63;PageIndex&amp;#61;2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is a unit test in the attached patch that replicates the problem &amp;#40;as long as the patch to SubSonicRepository isn&amp;#39;t applied&amp;#41;, basically SubSonicRepository.Update&amp;#47;Save doesn&amp;#39;t check item.IsDirty so generates and tries to execute invalid SQL resulting in an &amp;#34;incorrect syntax near the keyword &amp;#39;WHERE&amp;#39;&amp;#34; error.  This happens when&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a&amp;#41; The object hasn&amp;#39;t been changed&lt;br /&gt;b&amp;#41; The object doesn&amp;#39;t have any &amp;#34;magic&amp;#34; columns such as ModifiedOn etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Applied against r441&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>smason</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:19:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: PATCH: SubSonicRepository.Update on non-modified object 20080514P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true"</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16468</link><description>The issue is that the isloaded flag is not set after an insert and therefore subsequent database calls get no dirty columns.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: robsworld2006 ** &lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure if this is really fixed still&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DB.Update doesn&amp;#39;t seem to work properly&lt;br /&gt;This no longer works, it used to work but no longer works&lt;br /&gt;Member m &amp;#61; new Member&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;m.IsLoaded&amp;#61;true&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;m.IsNew&amp;#61;false&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;m.FirstName&amp;#61;&amp;#34;Joe&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;DB.Update&amp;#60;Member&amp;#62;&amp;#40;m&amp;#41;&amp;#59; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;always returns 0 for me&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>robsworld2006</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 09:29:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true" 20080514A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: QuickTable Improperly Qualifies Column Names When Where Clauses are Used</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16181</link><description>Upgrading from 2.1 beta 1 to beta 3 caused where clauses on my quicktables to fail with the following error &amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The multi-part identifier &amp;#34;dbo.columnName&amp;#34; could not be bound.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would appear to be due to a change made for Issue 15984&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The attached patch solved the problem for me.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: seedy ** &lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve just tested it with Rev. 441 and it seems to be working fine eric.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>seedy</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:04:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: QuickTable Improperly Qualifies Column Names When Where Clauses are Used 20080513P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: MySql Connector 5.2.2.0 Updates and some related bug fixes</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16561</link><description>I have updated Subsonic to support the latest MySql connector client &amp;#40;5.2.2&amp;#41;. The main difference is that the parameter marker is changed &amp;#40;or is prefered to be&amp;#41; the &amp;#64; sign and not the &amp;#63;. The code uses the &amp;#64; sign hardcoded, maybe this should become a parameter or something but I do not have the time to do it right now. &lt;br /&gt;Anyway more importantly the patch has some fixes relating to in&amp;#47;out parameters of stored procedures a fix for the calendar control relating to the greek culture, some fixes relating to the unsigned data types, a fix related to having a primary key called id, etc.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>ncichris</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: MySql Connector 5.2.2.0 Updates and some related bug fixes 20080513P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Problem updating a RepositoryRecord that has just been added</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16429</link><description>When using the RepositoryRecord templates it is not possible to insert a new record and then update a field&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;RecordType r &amp;#61; new RecordType&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;r.Field1 &amp;#61; &amp;#34;val1&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;r.Field2 &amp;#61; &amp;#34;val2&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;DB.Save&amp;#40;r&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;r.Field2 &amp;#61; &amp;#34;new val 2&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;DB.Save&amp;#40;r&amp;#41;&amp;#58; &amp;#47;&amp;#47; This will not update Field2 in the database&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think the problem is in RecordBase.cs line 311&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;         &amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; Sets a value for a particular column in the record&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;&amp;#47;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;columnName&amp;#34;&amp;#62;Name of the column, as defined in the database&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;oValue&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The value to set the type to&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;        public void SetColumnValue&amp;#40;string columnName, object oValue&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            columnSettings &amp;#61; columnSettings &amp;#63;&amp;#63; new TableSchema.TableColumnSettingCollection&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47;add the column to the DirtyColumns&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47;if this instance has already been loaded&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47;and this is a change to existing values&lt;br /&gt;            if&amp;#40;IsLoaded &amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;IsNew&amp;#41; &amp;#47;&amp;#47; Shouldn&amp;#39;t this be&amp;#58; if&amp;#40;IsLoaded &amp;#124;&amp;#124; &amp;#33;IsNew&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                TableSchema.Table schema &amp;#61; GetSchema&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                object oldValue &amp;#61; null&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                string oldValueMsg &amp;#61; &amp;#34;NULL&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                string newValueMsg &amp;#61; &amp;#34;NULL&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                bool areEqualOrBothNull &amp;#61; false&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Stefan&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;See&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;subsonic&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;16468&lt;br /&gt;Fixed in Rev. 439&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:52:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Problem updating a RepositoryRecord that has just been added 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>CLOSED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16546</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just tried using the scaffold control and noticed a bug with foreign key being a guid I have posted here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3200&amp;#47;13276.aspx&amp;#35;13276&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bug is similar to the one that was fixed here, but I noticed in the latest svn that code doesn&amp;#39;t exist anymore&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;subsonic&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;14377&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Closed per submitter's request...</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CLOSED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Where() Operations on Collections Do Not Support Comparision.In and Comparison.NotIn</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16547</link><description>When Querying a ViewCollection with Comparision.In operation, it act as a Comparision.Equal&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;following is my code&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;                string cusid &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                for &amp;#40;int i &amp;#61; 0&amp;#59; i &amp;#60; cusCol.Count&amp;#59; i&amp;#43;&amp;#43;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#43;&amp;#61; cusCol&amp;#91;i&amp;#93;.CustomerId &amp;#43; &amp;#34;,&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;                if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;string.IsNullOrEmpty&amp;#40;cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#61; cusid.Substring&amp;#40;0, cusid.Length - 1&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                col.Where&amp;#40;StyleDetailView.Columns.Customer, Comparison.In, cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the sql that generated&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#42; GetSelectSql&amp;#40;cos_ProductionView&amp;#41; &amp;#42;&amp;#47; SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT  &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Style_NO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;StyleNOIssued&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO_Sent&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSupplier&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPrice&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPriceConfirmed&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FobOrCmt&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;MainFabricCode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyRecFabDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_FabricDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SpecialTrimOrEmbellish&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Patt_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyProductionYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;RequirePP&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ProductPackDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SmplApprovalDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;LC_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OKToShip&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_ChinaDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualShippedDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ShippingMode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;TargetPort&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContainerOrLcl&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Packaging&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Comment1&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Merchandiser&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;InputDatetime&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; FROM &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93; WHERE &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#64;Customer0 AND &amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; BETWEEN &amp;#64;startOrderedDatetime AND &amp;#64;endOrderedDatetime&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and excepation infomation is said that can&amp;#39;t convert from a string to a int32&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Fixed in Revision 441&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:46:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Where() Operations on Collections Do Not Support Comparision.In and Comparison.NotIn 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Querying a view with Comparision.In operation it act as a Comparision.Equal</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16547</link><description>When Querying a ViewCollection with Comparision.In operation, it act as a Comparision.Equal&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;following is my code&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;                string cusid &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                for &amp;#40;int i &amp;#61; 0&amp;#59; i &amp;#60; cusCol.Count&amp;#59; i&amp;#43;&amp;#43;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#43;&amp;#61; cusCol&amp;#91;i&amp;#93;.CustomerId &amp;#43; &amp;#34;,&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;                if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;string.IsNullOrEmpty&amp;#40;cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#61; cusid.Substring&amp;#40;0, cusid.Length - 1&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                col.Where&amp;#40;StyleDetailView.Columns.Customer, Comparison.In, cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the sql that generated&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#42; GetSelectSql&amp;#40;cos_ProductionView&amp;#41; &amp;#42;&amp;#47; SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT  &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Style_NO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;StyleNOIssued&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO_Sent&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSupplier&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPrice&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPriceConfirmed&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FobOrCmt&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;MainFabricCode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyRecFabDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_FabricDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SpecialTrimOrEmbellish&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Patt_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyProductionYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;RequirePP&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ProductPackDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SmplApprovalDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;LC_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OKToShip&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_ChinaDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualShippedDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ShippingMode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;TargetPort&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContainerOrLcl&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Packaging&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Comment1&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Merchandiser&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;InputDatetime&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; FROM &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93; WHERE &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#64;Customer0 AND &amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; BETWEEN &amp;#64;startOrderedDatetime AND &amp;#64;endOrderedDatetime&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and excepation infomation is said that can&amp;#39;t convert from a string to a int32&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the report... I&amp;#39;ve fixed this for my next check-in...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Querying a view with Comparision.In operation it act as a Comparision.Equal 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: ExecuteJoinedDataSet() Improperly Performs JOINs on 1-to-1 PK/FK Relations</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16548</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I found a bug with the scaffold control when doing a 1 to 1 table mapping, a full description of the bug, the tables used and where the problem can fixed is shown here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3201&amp;#47;13278.aspx&amp;#35;13278&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically the wrong primarykeyvalue is being passed when editing a grid row item&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Fixed in Revision 440.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:46:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: ExecuteJoinedDataSet() Improperly Performs JOINs on 1-to-1 PK/FK Relations 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Control [BUG]: 1 to 1  Relationship Problem</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16548</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I found a bug with the scaffold control when doing a 1 to 1 table mapping, a full description of the bug, the tables used and where the problem can fixed is shown here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3201&amp;#47;13278.aspx&amp;#35;13278&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically the wrong primarykeyvalue is being passed when editing a grid row item&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the report... I&amp;#39;ve fixed this for my next check-in...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:44:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Control [BUG]: 1 to 1  Relationship Problem 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true"</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16468</link><description>The issue is that the isloaded flag is not set after an insert and therefore subsequent database calls get no dirty columns.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Fixed in Revision 439.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:13:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() Does Not Set IsLoaded="true" 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() throws an error with empty set clause</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16468</link><description>The issue is that the isloaded flag is not set after an insert and therefore subsequent database calls get no dirty columns.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: erickemp ** &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the report... I&amp;#39;ve fixed this for my next check-in...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>erickemp</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:07:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: DB.Update() throws an error with empty set clause 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Scaffold Control [BUG]: 1 to 1  Relationship Problem</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16548</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I found a bug with the scaffold control when doing a 1 to 1 table mapping, a full description of the bug, the tables used and where the problem can fixed is shown here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3201&amp;#47;13278.aspx&amp;#35;13278&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically the wrong primarykeyvalue is being passed when editing a grid row item&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>robsworld2006</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:54:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Scaffold Control [BUG]: 1 to 1  Relationship Problem 20080512P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Querying a view with Comparision.In operation it act as a Comparision.Equal</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16547</link><description>When Querying a ViewCollection with Comparision.In operation, it act as a Comparision.Equal&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;following is my code&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;                string cusid &amp;#61; &amp;#34;&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                for &amp;#40;int i &amp;#61; 0&amp;#59; i &amp;#60; cusCol.Count&amp;#59; i&amp;#43;&amp;#43;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#43;&amp;#61; cusCol&amp;#91;i&amp;#93;.CustomerId &amp;#43; &amp;#34;,&amp;#34;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;                if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;string.IsNullOrEmpty&amp;#40;cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                    cusid &amp;#61; cusid.Substring&amp;#40;0, cusid.Length - 1&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                col.Where&amp;#40;StyleDetailView.Columns.Customer, Comparison.In, cusid&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the sql that generated&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#42; GetSelectSql&amp;#40;cos_ProductionView&amp;#41; &amp;#42;&amp;#47; SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT  &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Style_NO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;StyleNOIssued&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;PO_Sent&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSupplier&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPrice&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualFobOrCmtPriceConfirmed&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FobOrCmt&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;MainFabricCode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyRecFabDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_FabricDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SpecialTrimOrEmbellish&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Patt_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualSelfYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;FtyProductionYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualContrastYield&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;RequirePP&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ProductPackDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;SmplApprovalDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;LC_DueDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OKToShip&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ETA_ChinaDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ActualShippedDate&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ShippingMode&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;TargetPort&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;ContainerOrLcl&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Packaging&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Comment1&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Merchandiser&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;InputDatetime&amp;#93;, &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; FROM &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93; WHERE &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Customer&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#64;Customer0 AND &amp;#91;cos_ProductionView&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;OrderedDatetime&amp;#93; BETWEEN &amp;#64;startOrderedDatetime AND &amp;#64;endOrderedDatetime&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and excepation infomation is said that can&amp;#39;t convert from a string to a int32&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>lin2000y</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:29:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Querying a view with Comparision.In operation it act as a Comparision.Equal 20080512A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16546</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just tried using the scaffold control and noticed a bug with foreign key being a guid I have posted here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3200&amp;#47;13276.aspx&amp;#35;13276&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bug is similar to the one that was fixed here, but I noticed in the latest svn that code doesn&amp;#39;t exist anymore&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;subsonic&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;14377&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: robsworld2006 ** &lt;p&gt;You can close this issue because I think it&amp;#39;s a composite key problem rather than scaffold control bug&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>robsworld2006</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:23:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int 20080512A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16546</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just tried using the scaffold control and noticed a bug with foreign key being a guid I have posted here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3200&amp;#47;13276.aspx&amp;#35;13276&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bug is similar to the one that was fixed here, but I noticed in the latest svn that code doesn&amp;#39;t exist anymore&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;subsonic&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;14377&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: robsworld2006 ** &lt;p&gt;The problem I think lies with how I defined my table&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have 2 tables&amp;#58;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Table1&amp;#58; UserCompetitoin&lt;br /&gt;composite key&amp;#58; UserID PK, CompID PK&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Table2&amp;#58; Portfolio&lt;br /&gt;ID PK&lt;br /&gt;UserID FK&lt;br /&gt;CompID FK&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is happening is that the sql being provided by the scaffold control joins on the right columns but only matches the first column as follows&amp;#58;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Query.cs line&amp;#58; 1731 &lt;br /&gt;ExecuteJoinedDataSet&lt;br /&gt;strJoin &amp;#61; &amp;#123; INNER JOIN &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;UserCompetition&amp;#93; J1 ON &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Portfolio&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;UserId&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#91;J1&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;UserId&amp;#93; INNER JOIN &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;UserCompetition&amp;#93; J2 ON &amp;#91;dbo&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;Portfolio&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;CompetitionID&amp;#93; &amp;#61; &amp;#91;J2&amp;#93;.&amp;#91;UserId&amp;#93;&amp;#125; &amp;#60;---- should be competitionID&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure if this is possible&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>robsworld2006</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:59:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int 20080512A</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/actionpack/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16546</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just tried using the scaffold control and noticed a bug with foreign key being a guid I have posted here&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;forums.subsonicproject.com&amp;#47;forums&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;3200&amp;#47;13276.aspx&amp;#35;13276&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bug is similar to the one that was fixed here, but I noticed in the latest svn that code doesn&amp;#39;t exist anymore&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;subsonic&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;14377&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards DotnetShadow&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>robsworld2006</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Scaffold Problem: Operand type clash: uniqueidentifier is incompatible with int 20080512A</guid></item></channel></rss>