<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.codeplex.com/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>CKS:EWE Beta 3</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/Project/ProjectRss.aspx</link><description>Working site for the EWE Beta 3 team</description><item><title>New Post: When to expect a public beta or release?</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=32077</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Does anyone have an idea of scope of work and when to expect a public beta or release of CKS:EWE?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In addition it would be great if PMs post an exprected feature list. This enables the ability for other users to comment og suggest features before it's &amp;quot;too late&amp;quot;.
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>lwikmark</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:17:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: When to expect a public beta or release? 20080723111748A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Wiki editor</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1886</link><description>Support for other editors - Telerik, TinyMCE, etc.  Not sure if this is anything we can&amp;#47;should do&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Customize rich text editor so clicking it&amp;#39;s buttons adds appropriate markup to the page rather than RTF formatting.  For example, selecting a word on a page and clicking the &amp;#34;bold&amp;#34; button will wrap the word in &amp;#34;&amp;#42;&amp;#42;&amp;#34; or whatever token represents bold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would also likely require two views of the wiki page in edit mode - Presentation and editing.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Tarentula ** &lt;p&gt;A question about the support for other Editors. I use the EWE with the Telerik RadEditor and it works fine without any adjustments in the code. For me is was as easy as installing Telerik RadEditor and enable the feature. Is there a more advanced thought behind the support statement that I missed&amp;#63; Otherwise I can say the it already works with Telerik.&lt;br /&gt;I have not done any customization of buttons though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Tarentula</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:04:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Wiki editor 20080520040446P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: image upload</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=2212</link><description>see &amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.hezser.de&amp;#47;blog&amp;#47;Lists&amp;#47;Beitraege&amp;#47;Post.aspx&amp;#63;List&amp;#61;be3605f5&amp;#37;2Da982&amp;#37;2D48e0&amp;#37;2Db361&amp;#37;2Df52c5dbeeba5&amp;#38;ID&amp;#61;18&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>tangible</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 13:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: image upload 20080520010849P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED RELEASE: Release .1</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=13549</link><description>Apparently Codeplex won&amp;#39;t let me publish without a Release, so here is one, just a placeholder.  Nothing to see here...move along...</description><author></author><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:44:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED RELEASE: Release .1 20080519034421A</guid></item><item><title>UPDATED WIKI: Home</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Home&amp;version=2</link><description>&lt;div class="wikidoc"&gt;
This is a placeholder to help organize the CKS EWE project for Beta 3.  It will eventually be moved back to the standard CKS project: www.codeplex.com/cks.  Please feel free to vote on Issues to help us prioritize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>dmann</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">UPDATED WIKI: Home 20080519034123A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1943</link><description>Would this even be possible&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Tarentula ** &lt;p&gt;I think this would be great. Other wikis have this and I think it&amp;#39;s rimes nicer with the WikiWiki meaning than checkin&amp;#47;checkout does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Tarentula</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:36:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits 20080505123609P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Sticky posts</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1876</link><description>&amp;#40;I don&amp;#39;t see how this really applies to a wiki, but it was suggested, so I included it...&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;I think this is more like a forums feature.  However, do we have a way to &amp;#34;feature&amp;#34; a wiki article the way wikipedia does&amp;#63;  That might be cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:58:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Sticky posts 20080502045857A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1943</link><description>Would this even be possible&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;I vote hell no on this.  Check-in &amp;#47; check-out and maybe post notification on the page itself that&amp;#39;s it&amp;#39;s checked out for editing by another user.  Simultaneous edits would be a nightmare of content merges.  handling 2 simultaneous edits probably wouldn&amp;#39;t kill but imagine 3 or more.  Yikes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:57:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits 20080502045712A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Integration with Word or OneNote</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1871</link><description>create a page in Word or OneNote and just &amp;#34;Publish&amp;#34; it to the wiki&lt;br /&gt;roundtrip capability&amp;#58; word&amp;#47;onenote --&amp;#62;Wiki --&amp;#62;word&amp;#47;onenote or wiki --&amp;#62;word&amp;#47;onenote --&amp;#62; wiki.  Including the ability to split documents into distinct wiki pages and then reassemble document after wiki editing&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: dmann ** &lt;p&gt;Yeah....still haven&amp;#39;t figured that out.  There may be some restrictions we have to put around it.  We&amp;#39;ll figure it out...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>dmann</author><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:43:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Integration with Word or OneNote 20080424124332P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1943</link><description>Would this even be possible&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>dmann</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:10:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED FEATURE: Simultaneous Page Edits 20080422071034P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Integration with Word or OneNote</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1871</link><description>create a page in Word or OneNote and just &amp;#34;Publish&amp;#34; it to the wiki&lt;br /&gt;roundtrip capability&amp;#58; word&amp;#47;onenote --&amp;#62;Wiki --&amp;#62;word&amp;#47;onenote or wiki --&amp;#62;word&amp;#47;onenote --&amp;#62; wiki.  Including the ability to split documents into distinct wiki pages and then reassemble document after wiki editing&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;From Office docs to wikis are great but I see the bigger business problem in going the other way.  Once you have 1000 wiki pages, how do you turn &amp;#40;portions of&amp;#41; that into a deliverable&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:15:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Integration with Word or OneNote 20080422121534P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: template system</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1878</link><description>see&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;meta.wikimedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Help&amp;#58;Template&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Wikipedia&amp;#58;Transclusion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Related to the token parser&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;I see transclusion as one feature - a trick of the parser where you assign the wiki content of a page to a token and it gets copied into another page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see templates as having default content on a page when you create a new wiki page.  This could give us the ability to override the existing default page when you type in a new page link as well as to create new pages of different templated page types &amp;#40;I&amp;#39;m thinking a la content types in the New menu&amp;#41;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:13:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: template system 20080422121311P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: template system</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1878</link><description>see&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;meta.wikimedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Help&amp;#58;Template&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Wikipedia&amp;#58;Transclusion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Related to the token parser&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: dmann ** &lt;p&gt;Matt&amp;#58; I was just copying over someone else&amp;#39;s comments.  How would you split them&amp;#63;  Can you provide some details&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>dmann</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: template system 20080421060645P</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED ISSUE: Document Generation from Wiki Pages</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1925</link><description>A great addition to the wiki capabilities would be to somehow mark wiki content for inclusion &amp;#40;or exclusion&amp;#41; and generate a word document from marked pages.  This would be a great way to use a wiki to generate deliverable documentation.  Imagine using a wiki for software release notes and instructions internally at an ISV and then generating a document which can be delivered to an external customer as a PDF.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: dmann ** &lt;p&gt;This is exactly the scenario we had in mind for the &amp;#34;Integration with Word or OneNote&amp;#34; Issue&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.codeplex.com&amp;#47;ckseweb3&amp;#47;WorkItem&amp;#47;View.aspx&amp;#63;WorkItemId&amp;#61;1871&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>dmann</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:04:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED ISSUE: Document Generation from Wiki Pages 20080421060457P</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Document Generation from Wiki Pages</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1925</link><description>A great addition to the wiki capabilities would be to somehow mark wiki content for inclusion &amp;#40;or exclusion&amp;#41; and generate a word document from marked pages.  This would be a great way to use a wiki to generate deliverable documentation.  Imagine using a wiki for software release notes and instructions internally at an ISV and then generating a document which can be delivered to an external customer as a PDF.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:45:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Document Generation from Wiki Pages 20080421014507A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: template system</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1878</link><description>see&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;meta.wikimedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Help&amp;#58;Template&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;en.wikipedia.org&amp;#47;wiki&amp;#47;Wikipedia&amp;#58;Transclusion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Related to the token parser&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;Transclusion seems like a neat trick but I think there is much more power in the template concept.  I think this should be separated into two different tasks and ranked independently&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:42:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: template system 20080421014208A</guid></item><item><title>CREATED ISSUE: Lockable wiki content pages which are still open for discussion</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1924</link><description>I&amp;#39;ve worked with organizations where wikis are used for software requirements gathering purposes, but b&amp;#47;c the requirement can not be locked and still discussed, the requirements kept changing and the tool eventually had to be abandoned.  I think it would be a great addition to create a read&amp;#47;write page, collab for a while, then lock the main content of the page into a read-only view while still allowing comments and discussions&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:39:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">CREATED ISSUE: Lockable wiki content pages which are still open for discussion 20080421013907A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: history breadcrumb" trail</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1882</link><description>showing progress through wiki - last n pages visited, etc, rather than a typical hierarchical breadcrumb&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;This is similar to how FlexWiki works.  It&amp;#39;s neat but occasionally confusing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:36:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: history breadcrumb" trail 20080421013616A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: Tag Cloud</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1875</link><description>make the tag cloud work with categories or get rid of the standard SharePoint categories and make it fully tag based.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;Not only should there be a tag cloud for the wiki, but there should be a way to switch between the cloud and a list of the terms sorted by frequency a la del.icio.us.  This is a great visualization option for those folks not savvy about tag clouds&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:34:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: Tag Cloud 20080421013429A</guid></item><item><title>COMMENTED FEATURE: show discussions on wiki page</title><link>http://www.codeplex.com/ckseweb3/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=1880</link><description>discussions webpart display by default below the associated wiki page&amp;#63; &amp;#40;or have it be an option to start minimized, etc&amp;#63;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mranlett ** &lt;p&gt;I much prefer the way that MediaWiki does discussions - on a separate tab associated with the main content but not actually part of the content.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mranlett</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:33:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">COMMENTED FEATURE: show discussions on wiki page 20080421013304A</guid></item></channel></rss>